Do I have your agreement that if those six points I made are correct, then it only makes sense that the references in the Constitution are not to Vattel, but to the other author I mention?
It's really not that hard. It seems a compelling case to me. Does it not seem a compelling case to you?
Do I need to go over those six points again?
It seems to me that this should be very, very easy to agree to. And yet you seem to refuse. Why?
It's called Presumption of Fact.
Go play your little games with yourself.