One gets tired of hearing the same old ignorant saws time after time. I have plenty of support. Since you are new to this discussion, I won't expect that you should know of it. I will trot it out by and by. This is, after all, only an academic discussion at this point.
You have the burden of proof. You have contrived a definition of “natural born citizen” that has no contextual support.
One would think that those who argue that this (Meaning the unborn child who was Chinese when the picture was taken)
Is a natural born citizen, ought to have the burden of proof to demonstrate such a nonsensical thing. Again, it requires you believe the founders must be stupid.
We’re all upset Barack Obama has two Presidential elections. However, pushing your unsubstantiated definition of “natural born citizen” does not really help the cause.
What makes you think it is unsubstantiated? You just haven't seen the mountain of evidence which I and others have seen. It's pretty d@mn well substantiated.