Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Well, actually you have not pointed to any case law. Even Scalia and Thomas, who are the strongest originalist on the Court, would disregard your definition of “natural born citizen.”

It’s fine. You guys dislike Obama so much, you think by raising this point with Cruz and Rubio, that you will somehow bring about the end of Obama’s Presidency. It’s not going to happen. Even if he was found to be ineligible, the Supreme Court would never make a ruling that would overturn 4 plus years of laws/regulations.


476 posted on 03/09/2013 2:27:31 PM PST by HawkHogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies ]


To: HawkHogan
Well, actually you have not pointed to any case law. Even Scalia and Thomas, who are the strongest originalist on the Court, would disregard your definition of “natural born citizen.”

Oh, i've pointed to case law. I've been pointing to it for the last two years. You just haven't read any of my posts regarding it. If you will scan up thread a bit, you will find me referencing Minor v Happersett.

If you want more case law, i'll give you more case law, but I am currently pressed for time, and will likely have to abandon this discussion presently.

Here's a real quick one though. (Not the most prominent, but quite clear.)

Ex Parte Reynolds.

Read what the judge said.

542 posted on 03/09/2013 3:53:57 PM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson