Lots of things are possible Tau Food (clever, I think), but not so important as the reality that the US has accepted as chief executive, and commander in chief of our military, someone about whose origins were really know very little, and most of that from two autobiographies written before he was 35 and 45, and probably by an anonymous ghost writer named Bill Ayers.
For wild suppositions the suggestion that Frank Marshall Davis is Obama’s father seems more plausible. What is more important is that we really don't know, and the media have participated in the subterfuge.
A more likely, and seldom discussed attribute of our mystery golfer is the verifiability of his election. The issue is seldom discussed because few understand that with the approbation of both political parties, our voting processes are no longer auditable. No one, except someone generating numbers to suit his managers, can say how many voted, or for whom. Checking is impossible.
Most citizens don't imagine that their franchise to participate in representative government could be a sham, even when most know about Acorn, and some know that one of Obama’s earlier jobs was training activists for Soros’ “Project Vote.” Counting events reliably was my business for years, so I happen to have had to think about guaranteeing the validity of data - audit trails.
This is not the thread, so I will only say that were our votes instead numbers of molecules of a contaminant in a drug sample sent to our FDA as part of an application for approval of a pharmaceutical, the FDA would not accept the application because the applicant handled the data after it was collected. The count needed to be protected from human editors.
Today our votes presumably get counted by scanners managed by the SEIU. (I say presumably because we have no assurance that any counting is done.) Absentee ballots are counted by the SEIU, away from public scrutiny. Our voting process is controlled by government employees whose salaries depend upon the results. Not only is Obama not a natural born citizen, his elections are not verifiable. Germany recently returned to a system based upon auditable paper ballots. There are very few who could explain how our votes are tabulated. Ask in your precinct sometime. Volunteers used to count the votes before leaving, and are now ushers in a system opaque, like Obama, by design. As Stalin explained, “In elections only who counts the votes matters.”
Well, Davis did live in Hawaii and did know Obama's family. He was born in Kansas.
So, if Davis was Obama's father and the woman who called herself "Stanley Dunham" was his mother and if she gave birth to Obama in Hawaii (where both parents lived), then Obama is a natural born citizen by even the most stringent standard.
On the other hand, if his father was a member of the Saudi royal family and he was born in Hawaii, then he is a natural born citizen only under the less stringent standard.
I am trying to picture members of the Supreme Court sitting around a table trying to sift through all this unsliceable baloney. Does anyone really believe that the Supreme Court is uniquely suited to correctly solving these kinds of mysteries?