The definition of natural born Citizen appears in the holding of SCOTUS’s unanimous decision of Minor v. Happersett (1874). Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote. The Minor v. Happersett ruling was based on an interpretation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court readily accepted that Minor was a citizen of the United States, but held that the constitutionally protected privileges of citizenship did not include the right to vote. SCOTUS rejected Minor’s argument that she was a citizen under the 14th Amendment of the U.S.Constitution, and examined her eligibility, concluding that she belonged to the class of citizens who, being born in the U.S. of citizen parents, was a natural born Citizen, and not covered by the 14th Amendment. This holding has been used in 25 consequent SCOTUS decisions since 1875.
86 posted on Monday, March 11, 2013 3:28:44 PM by SatinDoll
Little barry bassturd is not even constitutionally eligible for the office to which the pirate Roberts swore him in, THREE TIMES NOW! Sorry, you as a member of We The People are no longer sovereign in America, you/we all of us have been usurped by the globalist oligarchs holding the legislators' strings to which they dance. Don't take that lightly.
How old are you MHGinTN? n00b? You’re literally 10 years late on that one. Did you hear one of your children say Noob to someone on their Xbox Live headset? Do you think it makes you sound cool or hip?
“In other words, Minor did not settle the question of who was and was not a natural-born citizen, as the plaintiffs claim it did, it deliberately left the question open (as does the constitution, which does not define the term). The Supreme Court has held and lower courts affirmed that natural-born citizen refers to anyone born in the United States.”
Mr. Rogers and Jeff have already debunked your nonsense based on that case.
Please see the quote above. Many articles have already been written debunking the Minor v Happersett nonsense as well.