Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

That’s a personal opinion but ten different courts have ruled either implicitly or explicitly that Obama is a natural born citizen. No court has ruled that he is not a natural born citizen. That’s not excrement, that’s a fact.
For example, in a trial on the merits in Georgia, the court ruled:
“For the purposes of this analysis, the Court considered that Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Ankeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. Accordingly, President Barack Obama is eligible as a candidate for the presidential primary under O.C.G.A. under Section 21-2-5(b). February 3, 2012
http://www.scribd.com/doc/80424508/Swensson-Powell-Farrar-Welden-vs-Obama-Judge-Michael-Malihi-s-Final-Order-Georgia-Ballot-Access-Challenge-2-3-12


1,074 posted on 03/11/2013 11:42:44 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1042 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus

>> “That’s a personal opinion but ten different courts have ruled either implicitly or explicitly that Obama is a natural born citizen.” <<

.
So we have another trojan speaking up?

No court has or could rule that Oterror is a natural born citizen.

Yes, your post is a repeat of the excrement already dumped on us.

Minor V Happerset called out natural born as requiring two citizen parents, and they even used the other synonym, “natives,” that was used by De Vattel to characterize those with two citizen parents.

All other decisions since have referred to that well written decision.

It won’t go away, so just stuff it.
The big lie method isn’t going to work.


1,079 posted on 03/11/2013 11:55:00 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1074 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus; Red Steel; LucyT

Only the most shameless Fogblower or fellow traveler would dare to come on FR and hold up Malihi citing “as discussed in Ankeny” (clear meaningless dicta) as being “a trial on the merits” regarding Barry’s NBC status.

For starters, a “trial on the merits” would have included recognition of a plaintiff with standing to challenge Barry’s NBC status (never happened) and full discovery of Barry’s original HI vital records with cross-examination under oath of the custodian of those records.


1,237 posted on 03/12/2013 8:50:08 AM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1074 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson