Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Exercise your freedom with pot, and you increase my peril of being hit by a dangerously intoxicated driver.

So as a person of principle you also support a return to alcohol Prohibition - correct?

95 posted on 02/26/2013 7:27:27 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: JustSayNoToNannies

No, as a person who did drug/alcohol counseling for years, I would (1) point out the differences between pot and alcohol, and (2) point out that alcohol is under legal controls.

As for point #1, there is a known blood/alcohol parameter beyond which people are driving impaired. With pot, the active ingredient is used to “get high”, and that is the first effect of the substance. IOW, “high” is driving impaired, whereas a single social drink about every 1.5 hours or so does not approach impairment at all.

So, we’re talking about real information about differences between the two. If there were a joint that could be smoked that did not get the person high, and they could then drive unimpaired, then I’d view alcohol and marijuana the same. I suspect, however, that if someone were selling pot that couldn’t get you close to high after one joint that that wouldn’t be very popular pot.

I don’t know your state, but in mine there must be a license to sell alcohol, hard alcohol can be sold only in state stores, there is an age limit for use, and the books are full of driving and behavior penalties for impairment by alcohol and illegal sales of alcohol.


97 posted on 02/26/2013 8:31:29 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson