Now, I have used the "welfare state" argument to counter libertarians' insistence on open immigration. I think it would bankrupt us [faster].
But the drug users' medical bills we would be responsible for would probably be balanced out by reduced court and imprisonment costs.
The fact remains: enforcement can stop illegal immigration; enforcement cannot stop illegal drug use.
I just don’t understand the argument that, “we have a welfare state and it’s bad so we need a police state to keep the welfare state from costing us too much.”
That seems a move in exact opposition to freedom and personal responsibility.