Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: cab1982
You state that your wife is a British citizen. I believe the correct term is, "subject". There is a difference.
Where was your daughter born and under what passport did she travel? I concur that getting your state representatives involved with a complete paper trail. Good luck and keep us informed as to how things go.
43 posted on 02/17/2013 5:26:19 AM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: outofsalt

My daughter was born in the US and traveled on her US Passport, but from my understanding she may have dual citizenship?


44 posted on 02/17/2013 6:47:09 AM PST by cab1982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: outofsalt

The only people who are now considered British ‘subjects’ in technical terms are Irish citizens born before 1949(when Ireland became a republic), which has very little significance, other than the fact that an Irishman or Woman born before then has the right to style themselves ‘Sir’ or ‘Dame’ if they receive a UK Knighthood (e.g. Sir Terry Wogan).

Everyone else has been a citizen since 1983 when the British Nationality Act of 1981 came into force. Before then, pretty much anyone who had the Queen as the Head of State was considered a British ‘subject’ as well as a citizen of their respective country.


48 posted on 02/17/2013 3:29:44 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson