The information on the document may be proven to be not so, regardless if the document is the original or a fac simile.
True, but that’s not what they’ve claimed. They’ve claimed the document itself is a forgery. They’ve said nothing about the birth facts on the document being incorrect.
If Grandma lied about the birth facts and obtained a valid COLB, the original paper document isn’t a forgery.
If Hawaii knowingly fabricated an original paper document for him, the original is a forgery not the electronic copy.
If he changed the information in the electronic copy from what is on the original, then the electronic copy is a forgery.
If the electronic copy matches the original paper document, how is it possible to determine that the original is a forgery by examining the electronic copy?
It doesn’t compute for me, but then I never bought into the Kenyan-born theory. I think he propagated the Kenyan-born persona for personal gain ... until it became a liability.
He’s a liar. Always has been, always will be. He also lied about being a Christian for personal gain when it’s clear from his statements that he doesn’t have a personal relationship with Christ.