Posted on 01/24/2013 11:04:39 AM PST by eastexsteve
http://www.rep-am.com/articles/2013/01/24/news/connecticut/doc51016910d4f09357472280.txt
Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:05 PM EST
Sandy Hook police report still months away
HARTFORD — A final report on the deadly shooting at Sandy Hook Elemenmtary School is likely months away, and it may take even longer before its findings are made public.
State police are not expected to wrap up the criminal investigation of the Newtown school shooting until June at the earliest, according to Danbury State’s Attorney Stephen J. Sedensky.
His office is responsible for reviewing the investgation’s findings and issuing a final report on the incident.
Sedensky told a special comission that Gov. Dannel P. Malloy appointed that he is not anticipating that the investgation will result in any criminal prosecutions.
If that changes, it could delay the release of the final report on the investigation into the mass murder of 20 first-graders and six staff members at Sandy Hook while any criminal cases are pending.
Sednesky offered to share information with the Sandy Hook Advisory Committee that does not compromise the ongoing criminal probe.
However, he said he will be unlikely to offer any insight into the mental state of the the Sandy Hook shooter because any records relating to the 20-year-old man’s mental health are confidential.
The gubernatorial commission met for the first time Thursday. Malloy appointed the group to help him develop responses to the Sandy Hook shooting.
Malloy reminded panel members that he is looking for recxommendations for reducing gun violence, bolstering school safety and improveing mental health services.
The governor gave the Sandy Hook commission a March 15 deadline to report back to him.
“In EVERY shooting such as Newton, almost the first thing that the cops & media did was to hold up the weapon used for all to see.”
When do they do this? I’ve seen them do it at trials, but never shortly after the shooting. Got links to any videos to back that up?
It will provide you with the clearest, most concise answers to all your question. There are a multitude of highly suspect blog pieces all over the Internet which are filled with incorrect and misleading information. You will find NONE of that in this interview. Without a doubt the most authoritative discussion I have been able to find by an expert in both weaponry and criminal investigation.
The are a large number of FR skeptics who always rise to the occasion re: These types of incidents. I suggest they too listen to the complete interview.
“What difference does it make?”
I think we can start just using:
“WDDIM”
Sorry to disagree. i have spent 3 days on all the video eye witness accounts and compared to “official” story. nothing but nothing adds up.
Read the tag line - it says it all:
Will give it a listen. Thanks.
No, and neither do you.
And you don't care. You're just arguing, because that's what you like to do. :-)
“,.....Sedensky told a special comission that Gov. Dannel P. Malloy appointed that he is not anticipating that the investgation will result in any criminal prosecutions.
If that changes,it could delay the release of the final report on the investigation into the mass murder of 20 first-graders and sixstaff members at Sandy Hook while any criminal cases are pending.
Sednesky offered to share information with the Sandy Hook Advisory Committee that does not compromise the ongoing criminal probe......”
OK, simple question :
Since the perp is dead, who would they go after in a criminal investigation? ?????
#1 - Correct
#2 - Hogwash. Witnesses are notoriously unreliable, especially under stress. Guys running by the window could easily have been cops responding, not other shoots. Who said the man chased down by police was armed?
#3 - Hogwash, we already know.
#4 - Possibly correct, they have said they probably won’t release the full toxicology report, but we’ll have to wait and see.
#5 - Correct
#6 - Total hogwash. We already know the weapons used. The ME never changed his story. The locals never said handguns were used, that was all reported in the media attributed to unnamed federal officials, most likely from the DOJ.
Oh well, I guess you could say 2 out of 6 ain’t bad.
Okay, I probably posted badly.
What I meant was that after 6-8 weeks, the ‘official facts’ should be pretty much nailed-down, but they aren’t at all. There are so many discrepancies in the various accounts, it’s mind-boggling and I truly wondering if an ‘gun control agenda conspiracy’ does exist. I’m thinking it does.
1 + 2 = 9 - 4 = 11 - 8 = 2 + 3 = 0...
What difference, at this point, does it make, screamed Senator Dianne Feinstein...
1. Mother not teacher at school. Why account after account of her being a teacher?
2. Weird guy with 25 children mysteriously brought to his house blocks from the school. In one version he said a man brought them. In another version he said a female school bus driver just dropped them off. Makes no sense. Yet man is called “Sandy Hook hero” in MSM accounts.
2. No injuries. Just deaths. No ambulances at the scene. No children or adults brought to hospitals.
3. Adam Lanza hadn't seen brother in over 2 years. How did he get brothers ID?
4. Where has Adam Lanza been for last 2 plus years. No record of being student or working.
5. Why kill children at school? Adam Lanza had no connection to school.
6. Why did Adam Lanza erase/destroy all computer info?
7. How did Adam Lanza die? Who killed him?
8. Why did Adam Lanza kill his mother and then go to a school he had no connection with to kill children?
No I am saying the conspiracy nuts are drawing their conclusions from data they don’t have. Their whole argument is around the idea “I don’t know what happened but the official version isn’t true”.
How do you now the official version isn’t true if you don’t know what happened?
It’s like the 9/11 Truthers. All their evidence was stuff they didn’t know.
The details of Sandy Hook shootings are being molded by the White House propagandists with the willing cooperation of the media to fit Obama's narrative. Like the Reichstag fire this "crisis" will be used by Obama as an all out assault on the Bill of Rights. We are on our way to becoming a totalitarian state.
“Can you really tell me that there is a natural, psycological reason for someone to murder a kindergarten class and that demonic possession did not play a role?”
Yes I can.
“Running amok, sometimes referred to as simply amok[1] (also spelled amuk, from the Malay meaning “mad with uncontrollable rage”) is a term for a killing spree perpetrated by an individual out of rage or resentment over perceived mistreatment. The syndrome of “Amok” is found in the DSM-IV TR.[2”
“”Running amok” is used to refer to the behavior of someone who, in the grip of strong emotion, obtains a weapon and begins attacking people indiscriminately, often with multiple fatalities. The slang term going postal is similar in scope. Police describe such an event as a killing spree. If the individual is seeking death an alternate method is often suicide by cop.
“Amok is often described as a culture-bound (or culture-specific) syndrome,[9][10] which is a psychological condition whose manifestation is strongly shaped by cultural factors. Other reported culture-bound syndromes are latah and koro. Amok is also sometimes considered one of the subcategories of dissociative disorders (cross-cultural variant).”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Running_amok
Yeah, “running amok” is a pseudo-science term for “demonic possession”.
“And every little boy obeyed ?”
No, I’m sure a lot of kids peeked. So what? That actually works against the conspiracy theorists, since if they peeked and saw no bodies, no carnage, then some would have told their parents, and we’d have heard all about it by now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.