[Jane Long]

..."We would interpret a spouse's club's decision to exclude a same-sex spouse as sexual discrimination because the exclusion was based upon the spouse's sex."

Uhm, no...not because of their sex, but because of their sexual orientation.

This is getting more and more disgustingly ridiculous. The club should move their meetings off site and refuse to *evolve*.

[Marie]

...”We would interpret a spouse’s club’s decision to exclude a same-sex spouse as sexual discrimination because the exclusion was based upon the spouse’s sex.”

No. It be because they are NOT a spouse. Gay marriage is not legally recognized by the military and they are not ID carrying dependents.

[Tublecane]

No, not because of their orientation, either. Because they don’t recognize them as spouses, which no amount of play-acting will change.