[Sarabaracuda]

If it was up to you purists there would be no "game" (a strange choice of words). There are not enough people who would fit your definition of purity to ever form a political party capable of achieving power.

And since you brought up Reagan, I assume he never did anything which was impure in your eyes. He too compromised not because he wanted to but because he had to considering the reality of DC at the time of his presidency. The greatest men know when to do so.

[Norm Lenhart]

The only true purist was crucified.

Reagan had a few things I took issue with. His biggest mistake and one he admitted that WAS his biggest mistake was the immigration. So I’m fine with a man that admits he was wrong. Which he did. Which you won’t.

Again, the opposite of purity is corruption. Every time one of you screams “purist”, what you are really saying is that you are OK with corruption. Because if you were not OK with it, “puris” would not be a bad word to you.

BTW, ever going to address my Burqua comments?

Probably not as you just keep right on dodging. Thank you for turning more against the GOP.