“When an error is made on official document?”
The “official document” IMO on reflection, is the microfilm, not the label on the box containing the microfilm.
Corsi went national with his discovery that the microfilm in the box labeled through Aug 7 only went through Aug 1. The microfilm appeared to be CUT to remove the records on the dates when a certain baby might have been recorded entering the country.
Having been apprised by Corsi of the fact that the film in the box only went through Aug 1, a helpful clerk may have corrected the label by hand.
Certainly a properly brought action that would include discovery to investigate what happened to the CUT missing microfilm. I don’t think this legal action focusing on the box label is it. The Obama Admin. is the ultimate custodian of these records and Holder the ultimate prosecutor of any wrongdoing, so without a non-existent independent prosecutor (law has lapsed), not much hope.
Butter, Birth announcement ping!