Sustaining the homosexual lifestyle by the taxpayer is not "sustainable"
The debt and deficit is also not "sustainable"
In a green world we must have "sustainability"
If they want to be consistent, they should demand that homosexuals get a license to practice homosexuality and they should be taxed to cover their increased cost to society for their health care.
“How about just being homosexual as the average life expectancy of a homosexual is about 46 years of age.”
Of course, in a study such as this, this factoid might make homosexuals a net positive for society insofar as they’ll have contributed much more to Social Security and Medicare than they take out. Smokers definitely are a net plus to SS for this reason. However, any such advantage could be quickly outweighed to the extent that homosexuals have a higher propensity to collect SS disability payments. I just don’t know the statistics on the latter.
I’ve always supported a sodomy tax that funds AIDS research.