Replies

Again total nonsense. The data just isn't there, certainly in the fossel record to support Darwinism. That's why Harvard evolution guru Stephen Gould came up with his theory of punctuated equilibrium, to deal with the fact there is no date to support classic Darwinism. The trouble is, there is no data to support puntuated equilibrium either. Science is based on observation and measurement. Evolution has never been observed and the theory can't be faslified, another scientific flaw. It is a mere tautology.

Really? Do you have any clue how the scientific method works, or how theories are developed and refined over time? Have you ever examined any evolutionary evidence for yourself, and do you have any of the background knowledge needed to understand the evidence? (And by evidence, I mean any evidence, not just the fossil record. Geology, molecular biology, taxonomy, astronomy... any number of science disciplines will do.)

Yeah, I didn't think so. How about you learn the actual basis of the theories regarding the nature of the physical world before you try to make comments about it?