Posted on 11/20/2012 7:21:32 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama
An error ended.
Jew hater Ron Paul gave his farewell address to CONgress.
To Ron Paul, the patron saint of malcontents, druggies, and weirdos, I say this: good riddance and thanks for a whole lotta nuthin'.
Now I know that sounds harsh, but let's face it gang, one of the reasons why we have another four years of of the Hope and Che Guy is Ron Paul. Yeah, I'm going to come right out and say it and I don't give a hoot who calls me a "neocon" for saying so. The truth must be told, consequences be damned.
Now, before you call me nuts, really sit and think about it: Did RuPaul (H/T Mark Levin) or his Stormfront troopers attack Mitt Romney and his RINO-riffic campaign during the Republican primaries ? No. They attacked Conservatives like Michele Bachmann, Rick Santorum, and Newt Gingrich, forcing them to waste valuable time and valuable resources defending themselves from baseless attack after baseless attack. (In other words, Cut and Run Paul was Romney's wing man.) To be fair, there's no way of knowing of whether or not one of them would have beaten our Dear Leader (and his dead and imaginary voters), but I'm willing to go out on a limb and say they had a better chance than Romney ever did. At least they stood for something, which is something Romney really can't say with a straight face.
After the primaries ended, and Red Skull Ron was handed yet another predictable loss, did he rally his troops and say, "Look, we lost. But now is not the time to dwell on that. Get out there and support Romney before the country is destroyed by Obama, and that goes for you folks in the Gary Johnson and Virgil Goode camps as well" ? Nope. We got none of that. Instead, we got silence or "Buy my swag! Half-off!" Would this have made a difference ? I don't know, but I'm fairly certain that it wouldn't have hurt. (Yes, I know I lambasted Romney in the previous paragraph, but he did win. Shrimpy should have done the right thing and got behind the primary winner. Bachmann did it, Santorum did it, and so did Gingrich.)
The funny thing about this is the fact that I agree with the Surrender Monkey on several issues. I'm all for auditing the Federal Reserve. I'm all for repealing the 16th and 17th Amendments. I'm all for the US giving the UN the social finger. I am, after all, a hard right winger and I make no apologies for that whatsoever. When Ron Paul isn't blaming the US for 9/11, attacking the military, pushing the homosexual agenda, calling the infanticide known as abortion a "states rights issue", calling the OWS barbarians "victims", or coddling America's Islamonazi enemies, the man almost makes sense. (Cue up the tired "broken clock" analogy.) I can't and won't deny it. But at the same time I couldn't be happier watching Ron Paul become a meaningless footnote in American history. As far as I'm concerned, another career politician is gone, and last time I checked, that's always a good thing.
Of course not. Just like the Republican Party drove away other groups of voters purist conservatives are determined to drive away groups of voters that may have enough overlap on certain issues to get their votes. Who needs the libertarians? Its better to have them vote for somebody else. And who needs the young people? Let them vote for somebody else. And who needs minorities, its more fun to rail about Hispanics than figure out how to keep strongly conservative Cuban Americans (for example) voting Republican.
Instead we should concentrate on only putting forth candidates who hold a narrow and specific set of beliefs, and only try to appeal to voters who are 100% in agreement with those beliefs. Lets find candidates who think that women don't get pregnant from rape. They seem to appeal to a broad spectrum of voters.
I hope he finds excellent care in an assisted living arrangement where they will change his diapers, wipe the drool from his face and attempt to make him right in the head with prescription drugs.
If I’m not mistaken, didn’t your hero vote to repeal DADT ?
Why yes, yes he did.
If the Rs took the good part of Libertarianism and not the freaky part, that would be good. But the no holds barred porn/prostitution/dope/faggot platform, plus the luv of muzzies, is a deal breaker. The Rs would lose forever that way.
Hey, I’ve got an idea! How about sticking to the Constitutional duties of the fedgov!!!
Ron Paul is serious about running the government according to the Constitution and getting the government off the people’s backs. Oh no, no, no we can’t have that, now can we?
The libertarian party measures it’s voters by the thousands doesn’t it?
Once More, For Old Times Sake:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RON PAUL SUPPORTER PRIMER:
(credit goes to RaceBannon)
#1. Be Arrogant
#2. Be Condescending
#3. Be self-important
#4. Be self-righteous
#5. Tout your superior intellect to help overcome your lack of self-confidence (see numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4 then go straight to #15).
#6. Give slippery rhetorical answers to straight questions
#7. Hide/Ignore or spin Ron Paul’s congressional record of 23 Years in Congress, creating 620 bills of which 4 made it to the floor and only one became law.
#8. When cornered and have no truthful or direct response, spout angry, non-topic rhetoric as an answer, then see #19.
#9. Hide your Democrat voting status from the public & pretend you’re a Republican.
#10. Blame everyone else, never take credit for a problems like Barack Obama because we are closet Ultra-Liberals
#11. Berate and/or belittle your opponent whenever losing an argument, then see #19
#12. Blame America for the world hating the US and act like an Arab Psychiatrist/Pathologist when promoting the 9/11 Jihad conspiracy.
#13. Be courteous and direct others to their local cable or satellite channel that carries reruns of Conspiracy theory with Jesse “You deserve to lose a few” Ventura.
#14. Copy and paste data from whatever unreliable source you can find to try and validate your argument.
#15. Avoid/ignore any or all valid retort or facts that invalidate your agenda at all costs or whenever possible. (Go back to #6)
#16. Create a fictitious Facebook persona to hide your true identity like our Anarchist/OWS cousins.
#17. Make cowardly drive-by hit and run comment and/or “like” a fellow Paulbot’s hit and run comment.
#18. Bait adversaries by commenting/posting irrelevant points and/or points you were making during your last debate with someone totally different on another topic all together without looking like you are arguing with yourself. Try to avoid looking foolish at all costs.
#19. Scurry over to your nearest Ron Paul thread and alert other bots to join you and that you require assistance because you’re losing your delusional Liberal arguments. Then medicate, repeat, put on your drool bib and go back to marching in the paper slipper brigade.
#20. Follow #18 and 19 to the letter, then surround your opponent and take cheap pot-shots from your behind your fictitious Facebook persona (See #9 and #16).
#21. Before debating, avoid getting fecal matter in or behind your ears when removing your head from your rectum. This will be particularly useful when listening to CD’s of “Dr” Paul in your Toyota Prius.
#22. When casting your ballot for “Dr” Paul during online polls, remember to clear your cookies then repeat. Do this as many times as your fingers will allow or until the next episode of Colbert Reports, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, or your Mother calls down to the basement stairs to tell you that “dinner is ready”.
I don’t know. I might actually miss Ron Paul. While I disagree with a lot of what he says, and he definitely has made some offensive statements, at least he shows consistency. It’s time for him to go into retirement however (hope his crazy supporters don’t flock to Rand and give him delusions of grandeur)
I like Rand Paul’s stance on foreign aid, and I cheered at the RNC when he said about Obamacare, “I STILL THINK IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL!” He will likely be an influential figure in the years to come. Maybe not 2016. Further down the line?
So what should we compromise on ? Homosexuals defiling marriage ? Defending our borders ? Defending ourselves from terrorism ?
Sorry, I’m not budging on anything. We don’t need a big tent. We need the right ringleader.
There aren’t pills strong enough in the universe to fix that kind of insanity.
Heh, well does look like our candidate lost. Not whether that was due to external circumstances or not is up to others to decide. Not forgotten is for sure since most of what he was preaching has come true. I guess that if you just put your head into a bucket, you would never know..heh but much to your amazement, truth has arisen...heh.
Heh, Politics is a strange thing these days...
“Oh Noes!!!! Now the fake eyebrow market will collapse! Weez Doooooooooooomed!”
Somewhere in China, many are concerned.....
:)
I didn't know Ron Paul was a Jew hater?? Is this correct? And what is this based on?
How is voting for faggots in the military in line with the Constitution? (Just for starters.)
“Ron Paul is serious about running the government according to the Constitution and getting the government off the people’s backs.”
We judge this by what, precisely ? He says so ?
His luv of muzzies. And rantings against evil Zionists and Israel. I think that about covers it.
Hee-hee!
I like Rand. Solid Conservative. Not a nut job like his old man.
Let’s start with the fact that RuPaul thinks it’s just ducky for Islamonazi Iran wants to have nuclear weapons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.