Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: visualops

yeah, i’d just want to sell them the stuff outright, and let walmart worry about it from there


80 posted on 11/17/2012 3:57:43 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

scan based trading is only going to work in particular situations. It benefits the vendor only so much as it gives an inside track on sales and inventory levels, and likely might get you in a store that you might otherwise not (since the retailer is not making any investment in inventory) but that is a double edged sword since it isn’t sold until...sold. From a manufacturers or distributors perspective that would be rather tenuous IMHO. It’s beneficial to a retailer if they essentially are not having to invest in inventory if there isn’t a buy-back policy (unsold items returned to vendor). Some retailers want more control, for instance larger chains have their own distribution centers. Some suppliers directly supply stores rather than the DC’s though (fresh food for instance). It depends on the product. They are also likely to get a better price buying up front and assuming some of the risk. I can see where there would be some advantages for both sides.


81 posted on 11/17/2012 4:17:27 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson