Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
...As to my being more broadly “so knowledgeable all of a sudden,” am a careful student of your claims, which I regard to be non sequitur conclusions piled onto previous non sequitur conclusions.

I have a huge problem with that statement, everything you throw at me is nothing but the conclusions you've reached yourself from the images and sources I have posted. If you didn't read the private mails that were circulated, which were originally intended to be kept off site as part of the research repository, that's the only other way.

I've shown what Mary said in her own words many many times, I've shown the mistake Charlette Le Fevre made about the date, I've shown the photograph of two little boys and asked 'who do you think they might be?' side by side with composites of the two children they resembled to the extent that anyone with an open mind might see who they were, I didn't beat anyone over the head with it. Yes, I indicated that there never was a David, but I also made it clear that no one else had been able to find him either.

People can make up their own mind, they have eyes. I showed the Background Search document from the PI which, when he placed a certain name into Search with nothing more than name and a STATE IN THE US - brought up the birthdate and details of an indvidual whose ethnicity was shown as Equatorial Guinea, which was the stated origin of the 31 year old student who was interviewed at the Lumumba University on Moscow in 1992. He said he planned to work for the World Bank, which is where he ended up for a time, and then showed at the Equatorial Guinea Consul in Accra, Ghana.

I don't recall issuing any proclamations that this man was the same man, I simply showed his photographs, the article and documents, and that allows the reader to reach their own conclusions.

The Polarik video was created by Polarik, he was carrying out his own research, he gave me the link, I found it of interest, I posted the link into FR comments, I had very little to say about it, the video asked it's own questions.

There's more, I could go on all the way through what you have written, and show that all I ever did was try to provoke THINKING to get out of the

his mother was SAD, she had the hots for an ugly black man 35 years older and had to go to Kenya to have a baby because her mother would have been so embarrassed

...bunkum, which is all you've ever had to offer, and about which you will attack anyone who doesn't come to heel over. Your tactic is painfully obvious, you run every cockamamy charge you make into a litany of unanswerable mush, you do that because you know, that were you to frame your comments into indiviual questions, I have the documents, the links to articles and the photographs to go with them...and would blow your unfounded accusations out of the water. You are, on this thread, for example, pulling rabbits out of hats that any newbie has never seen before and can't hope to know what breed or colour they are...but that's your MO, isn't it, RIDICULE because you know it works, so you keep repeating BS out of context because what you want more than anything, is for the reader NOT to be allowed to THINK.

I sure hope who-ever you are working for is paying you enough, I would hate to think you are a successful OBSTRUCTIONIST for nothing.

You gotta keep repeating yourself because you don't want me to show freepers any more. I planned a further segment on the question of who might Lolo Soetoro have been, but you don't want me to do that, do you? You ridiculed that in advance by your convoluted charge that the Indonesian story was going to involve a Lebanese context, a right-regular piece of BS misinformation that was, and no one, not even you could be that stupid, so it had to be deliberate.

Why does the potential truth scare you that much? Why the desperate need to destroy the credibilty of the only freeper on these threads who writes about who he might be and where he might have come from?

Remember, I'm only on the thread because you pinged me, if only to once more attempt to belittle me. You're a bully, and your tactics work because your disgusting behaviour drives any decent, honest freepers away. So, in their absence, I won't be adding any further information here. Like I already said, the only time you get any oxygen is when it comes from me, you boring little man.

409 posted on 12/22/2012 1:04:46 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]


To: All; Fred Nerks

Per Fred Nerks’ faulty memory:

“There’s more, I could go on all the way through what you have written, and show that all I ever did was try to provoke THINKING to get out of the

“his mother was SAD, she had the hots for an ugly black man 35 years older and had to go to Kenya to have a baby because her mother would have been so embarrassed

“...bunkum, which is all you’ve ever had to offer, and about which you will attack anyone who doesn’t come to heel over.”

To All:

The comment above is the third time, IIRC, that Fred Nerks has posted the false claim that I have claimed that FMD is Barry’s dad as a fact along with a gratuitous smear of 53 year-old men of any race, in this case black. SAD was 18, so 35 years older would be 53 and supposedly UGLY, in Fred Nerks assessment of the handsome, dapper FMD who bedded women of all ages and races per his literary accounts. Fred Nerks has insulted the intelligence of FReepers by repeatedly posting pictures of 80-year-old FMD and inviting FReepers to judge him at that age as being repulsive and an impossible sexual partner for 18-year-old SAD.

I have only stated that FMD is one of two known black men in HI in 1960 with the means, motive and opportunity to have impregnated SAD and also to have interested parties with the financial means to have her spirited her off to Kenya for the birth of Barry.

Funding and motive for FMD could have been through KGB/Chicago Commie connections thus avoiding scandal undermining his Commie effectiveness by getting caught having impregnating a very young, white girl. For BHO Sr., possible KGB, Mboya or missionary resources could have been found prompted by a desire to prevent a scandal from getting him deported even earlier that similar scandals eventually did, thus derailing his promising political future career in Kenya. This could well be the motivation for a pregnancy cover-up trip to Kenya.

Given the facts revealed in INS FOIA docs that BHO Sr. WAS deported for sexually rampant activities including a pregnancy of a co-ed from Kenya resulting in her being sent to the UK abortion, it is not much of a stretch to imagine that parties deeply invested in his success would have put up the funds previously to pack off another pregnant girl to a foreign country, in this case Kenya not for an abortion, but for a delivery.

I have never claimed either man to conclusively be Barry’s dad. The forensic evidence is not there. But I have said that the very strong likeness between Barry and his half-brother David points towards them having the same father, but only DNA could prove that.

Fred Nerks’ Mal-Val narrative and his a priori investment in it seems to motivate him to stalk, hijack and spam eligibility threads to contest any evidence that BHO Sr. MIGHT be Barry’s dad or that SAD MIGHT be his mom and to assert delusional confabulations pointing to Malcolm X being the father and Varlerie Sarruf being the mother.


410 posted on 12/22/2012 3:08:01 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson