Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Seizethecarp
The two images Mark showed on his website before he removed them both showed a photograph of a child a few months younger and lighter in skin colour than the older, darker child he was shown sitting beside, the child on the left grew up to be the POTUS whose name at birth and whose place of birth we do not know, the other boy went to Kenya and is shown with his father and stepmother. One more time, here's the child on the left in composite, 1. Zero as a baby. 2. zero as a toddler. 3. Zero as shown on Mark's webpage. 4. Zero again in the second image shown on Marks webpage:

And you can cockadoodledoo all day and night long, nothing changes the fact that the child shown on the left is zero. Nothing. You can call him Tom Dick or Harry or David, that doesn't change who he is. The composite shows the same child FOUR TIMES.

393 posted on 12/21/2012 4:31:20 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp; All

Look at this way; if the boy on the left really is the child that was born in Kenya, and if his name really was David, what you have is the question, did the POTUS run away from home as a teenager, live in the streets of Nairobi until Malik found him and took him home, and one night after an altercation in a bar, did this young man ride home on Malik’s motorcycle and end up dead? Is that his ghost that is now POTUS?

Yep, we could all do with a laugh. I’m going Christmas shopping now, So MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!


394 posted on 12/21/2012 4:41:36 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies ]

To: All; Fred Nerks

Per Fred Nerks:

“The two images Mark showed on his website before he removed them both showed a photograph of a child a few months younger and lighter in skin colour than the older, darker child he was shown sitting beside, the child on the left grew up to be the POTUS whose name at birth and whose place of birth we do not know, the other boy went to Kenya and is shown with his father and stepmother.”

The “other (darker) boy who went to Kenya” is obviously several years, not “months” older than the younger boy, which happens to reflect their true identities of being Mark (b. 1965) and David (b. 1968).

But Fred Nerks’ Mal-Val narrative needs the boys to be months apart in age if they are to be Barry and Roman Obama, the baby Mary Toutonghi is supposedly too confused to remember as having a Filipina alternate wife mom and to remember that she babysat Roman in January 1961, not January 1962.

In Fred Nerks Mal-Val narrative, Roman Obama’s life takes more twists and turns than the JFK magic bullet!

Fred Nerks’ Roman Obama biographical narrative:

1. Roman is born presumably in HI to BHO Sr and Filipina wife, Anna S. (or perhaps someplace else in the US that Fred Nerks sometimes claims BHO Sr. went between 1956 and 1959 when he actually came to the US). Roman at birth named BHO II before being changed to Roman later when his ID is needed to help hide the child of Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf.

2. Roman is taken to Seattle by January 1961 where Filipina Anna appears in Polk living in the exact address where the alleged forged U of WA places SADO and has the baby babysat by Mary, but Mary does not actually report having babysat any alternative baby Obama other than Stanley Ann’s.

3. Per Fred Nerks, somehow “darker” Roman and Barry (”zero” per FN) appear together in a studio picture in approximately 1963-64 but are only months apart in age. Was this picture taken in HI? In WA? In any case, Roman and Barry are together in this narrative for this picture (actually Mark and David). In the Mal-Val narrative, at about the time of this studio picture the identity of Roman is taken from him and given to the “lighter” baby Barry (”zero”) who is claimed to be the child of Malcolm X and Valerie Sarruf for the purpose of protecting the precious baby from those who might murder him as they did his father.

4. Roman’s alleged Filipina mom, Anna S. Obama disappears from the narrative between 1961 and 1964 and Roman “went to Kenya,” as Fred Nerks claims, with his father and “step-mother” Ruth in 1964. They appear together in the family picture which Fred Nerks dates as 1965, the year that Mark was born. But supposed baby Mark is obviously close to two years old making the picture 1967...yet Roman looks about the same as he does in the supposed 1963-64 picture...if not younger. To my eye, the “darker” boy (actually Mark) that Fred Nerks claims is now Roman looks YOUNGER in the family picture to me that he does in the studio picture that Nerks claims was taken years earlier.

5. Roman grows up in Kenya and goes to college in Moscow.

6. Roman goes to Ghana and becomes a business man.

In consensus reality, the real Roman Obama has no evident connection to the POTUS or BHO Sr’s Kenyan family and no verifiable documentation or any witness testimony placing him in Kenya as a step-child of Ruth or elder step-brother to Mark. Ruth has never mentioned stepson Roman. Nor is there any direct evidence or witness statements supporting the existence of Roman’s alleged Filipina mother in HI or WA or anywhere. Nor is there any documentation of a marriage to this alleged Filipina mom of Roman or of a vital record or BC for Roman in the US under the name BHO II or any name.


396 posted on 12/21/2012 6:29:19 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson