She has a fine mind, and an independent way of thinking that is worthy of respect even when you disagree. A liberal feminist you could actually like! One of her quirkiest characteristics is that she’s a big fan of talk radio, Rush Limbaugh, and admirably defended Sarah Palin! I always look forward to reading what she’s go to say (on the political front, when she gets into the artsy-fartsy, not so much...)
I’ve always liked Paglia. Was disappointed in her choice (to say the least) in 2008. I like her even better now!!
yitbos
Here, though, is a clear appreciation of fact over image:
This is how the Democratic Party lost me by trading freedom for statism.
And here is what led to it. There's still a whiff of the collective in this but I think Paglia is correct:
All I see is white upper-middle-class liberals who speak in this unctuous way about the needs of the poor... They have no connection whatever with the working class.... It's the professional class gone amok. And that's why they don't notice what a bureaucratic nightmare Obamacare is.
Shall we enumerate the membership of this professional class one more time? The academics. The media. The members of government itself. If there is one common characteristic among these pieces of the New Class it is the degree to which its members are insulated from the outcomes of the policies it promotes. Institutional feminism has found a home in its embraces. So has institutional racism. And the reason we have academics, bureaucrats, and media celebrities in thousand-dollar suits upbraiding us all for our racism, sexism, homophobia, et dreary cetera, is that it, too, serves to differentiate them from us, to insulate them from the horrors they have every intention of inflicting on everyone else. Those are 0bama's people, they are 0bama himself, and the lot of them have, as their first priority, the maintenance of this immunity, this insulation, this barrier between parasite and victim.
a nutcase. who else would waste a vote on a Greenie with no chance?
She is still a huge idiot, because by voting for Jill Stein she is really voting for Obama.
“...but I would have never agreed to this land war in Afghanistan, this endless land war, as well as things like this Libyan incursion that Obama appears to have been pushed into by these women, like Hillary Clinton and Samantha Power, the chaos in foreign policy, the bowing to foreign leaders.”
Wow, nailed hillary. I wonder if in fact she did push obama into libya? He seems incapable of making strong decisions.
8:}
I’m sorry, but to attribute great intellect to this woman who comes to a conclusion in hindsight that many plumbers, housewives, and used car salesmen PREDICTED is foolhardy.
I too take great comfort in witnessing conversions to our side, but this one isn’t even converting to our side, and given she did the same thing with Clinton, this is the second time she’s chosen wrong.
I have this female friend who has a penchant for choosing the wrong men to be in her life. And she will continue to do so because she uses the shallowest of criteria to judge them while ignoring their very obvious faults. When the faults, obvious to everyone else, surface, she’s dumbfounded, and worse, angry at the man.
This is Camille Paglia. The fact that she’s voting for someone other than Obama is considered to be progress. No it’s not. It just displays the fact that she too continues to embrace liberalism at a time when it has never been more obvious that it is the ideology of small minds.
Ok, she writes well.