Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldpuppymax

The head pollster at Gallup said on Fox this AM when asked by Chris Wallace, that they don’t even consider party affiliation; he had a lot of reasons, that there were no national measurements of affiliation, that it went up and down with the rest of polling, that exit polls asking people to identify are , of course, polls themselves, so Gallup never measures it as an independent variable except for “informational purposes” near the end ( I presume of the election cycle, though he could have meant toward the end of the interview.) He did make a lot of enthusiasm though.


3 posted on 10/21/2012 10:34:31 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gusopol3; Oldpuppymax

Why the disparity in party affiliation polling between Rasmussen and Gallup?

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/archive/mood_of_america_archive/partisan_trends/summary_of_party_affiliation

http://www.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx


4 posted on 10/21/2012 10:39:08 AM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM (Sin Makes You Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: gusopol3

The fellow from Gallup means at the end of the interview. An easy way to reconcile the surge in support for Romney in Gallup to the modest uptick in Raz, is that Raz weights by the lagging average of party affiliation. Therefore, when party affiliation moves in concert with voter preference, Raz will, for a while, stifle the surge.


8 posted on 10/21/2012 10:55:21 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson