Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk; Cincinatus

After checking into the transcript between Axelord and Can-D, I have a question about the timeline. The interview took place on September 28 (I believe), and was aired on September 30. Now granted, I DO believe Axelrod was setting this up, but that was over two and a half weeks earlier, not just a couple of days. The fact that she had THAT transcript vs. all the other ones says she wanted to believe Axelrod’s excuse (essentially a lie) even though she had to know that is NOT what obama’s words implied.

The fact that she knew Axelrod’s line of reasoning before the debate and still THEN jumped in at a crtical point where Romney had obama beaten on the Benghazi question.....says Can-D was NOT impartial.


61 posted on 10/18/2012 6:58:03 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Girlene
.says Can-D was NOT impartial.

I'm not claiming that she is impartial. I am saying that she bought into this WH spin and was regurgitating it during the debate. That is a different statement than claiming that Obama and Candy set this up beforehand.

65 posted on 10/18/2012 7:01:32 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson