Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifster
but this idiots blog is clearly an anti constitution screed

I would classify it under the category Tantrum Delirium.
41 posted on 09/24/2012 3:32:28 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I have a new zest for life!"--Calvin from Las Vegas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana
CA should have paid $ 336,901,607,890, but only paid $313,998,874,000. That is almost a $23 BILLION deficiency under the rule of apportionment. And yet California gets to exercise 55 electoral college votes to elect the president which is not what the founders intended under the rule of apportionment!

The pinko politicians out in California have not only bankrupted their own state’s treasury, they are not paying their state’s FAIR APPORTIONED SHARE into the federal treasury relative to their massive pinko electoral college vote.

JWK

“The proportion of taxes are fixed by the number of inhabitants, and not regulated by the extent of the territory, or fertility of soil” 3 Elliot’s, 243,“Each state will know, from its population, its proportion of any general tax” 3 Elliot’s, 244 ___ Mr. George Nicholas, during the ratification debates of our Constitution.

42 posted on 09/24/2012 10:20:40 AM PDT by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson