Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: KennethJohnKelly
Elderd was born on British soil, not in the iUnited States,

You have proof of this? I'd like to see it. Monroe claims he was born in the United States.

More interestingly, yours is the first suggestion I “ve read that a man born of American slaves in, say 1864, would have been legally barred from running for President. Are you sure of that?

That is my understanding of the Dred Scott v Sanford ruling. If my understanding is in error, point out my error please. Supreme court decisions stand until overturned by New Law or subsequent court rulings. In this case, the 14th Amendment overturned this decision.

141 posted on 09/15/2012 12:44:51 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

1) The United States did not exist when Elldred wa born.
2) A man born of Anericann slaves could not have tried to run for President until after the 14th amendment was ratified (not old enough).
My question is: would that have been illegal in, say,1920, on the grounds that our hypothetical candidate would not have been an NBC?


143 posted on 09/15/2012 2:18:43 PM PDT by KennethJohnKelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson