[KC_Lion]

If not voting for Romney helps Obama.

Than not voting for Obama must help Romney!

[Psalm 144]

Careful now. Logic will disturb the ruminant herd and their cuds will sour. They might even stampede.

[Revel]

YUP...I am really disappointed that by not voting for Obama then I am casting a vote for Romney. But them are the breaks.

[BlueDragon]

If not voting for Romney helps Obama.

Than not voting for Obama must help Romney!

I'll do my part, by not voting for Obama. This sort of tough math question has some people stumped, but I've got it figured out well enough. Besides, I'm like deep-in-the hurtgen-forest surrounded by Dem voting Zombies, in a winner-take-all state.

For the first time in my life I won't be voting for either of the two main political party's candidates at the top of the ticket. I flat out refuse.

The GOP may have lost me forever now. They fail, and I'm pissed. They've not much represented me anyway, other than being a lesser or different evil from the rapidly increasing darkness of the Democrat Party.

I have begun to SERIOUSLY HATE THEM ALL!

[AuH2ORepublican]

Yes, when a liberal doesn’t vote for Obama, it helps Romney.

[MacMattico]

But what you forget with that logic is that the wing nut lefties will vote Obama no matter what. We all know that what we're dealing with here is conservatives that won't vote for Romney. If conservatives don't vote for Romney or Obama, Romney is hurt much more by the mere fact the libtards will be out in force for their messiah, while a conservative voting group that was never, ever going to vote for Obama anyway but traditionally votes Republican creates a net loss for Romney.

Same if Hispanics all decided to not vote for either candidate. Romney may lose a few votes, but Obama would lose the election.

[Nifster]

Tell that to Ross Perot voters who helped Bill Clinton get elected with 43% of the popular vote....that worked out so well

[COBOL2Java]

Thanks for the new tagline!

[OldEarlGray]

If not voting for Romney helps Obama.

Than not voting for Obama must help Romney!

Exactly!

The whole facade is not unlike, well - this methodology: 

The Detection of Witches

Created sometime in the Dark Ages by Sir Bedevere of the round table, the logic behind the detection of witches is as follows:

• Q- What do you do with Witches?

A- BURN THEM!!

• Q- What else do you burn apart from witches?

A- MORE WITCHES!! ... wood?

• Q- So, why do witches burn?

A- B..Because they're made of wood?

• Q- So, how do we tell if she is made of wood?

A- Build a bridge out of her!

• Q- Ahh, but can you not also build bridges out of stone?

A- Oh yeah, oh yeah, you can..

• Q- Does wood sink in water?

A- No, no it doesn't! Throw her into the pond!

• Q- No, what else floats in water?

A- Bread! Apples! Very small rocks! Cider! Gravy! Cherries! Mud! Churches! Lead!

• King Arthur - A duck.
• (GOP-e) GASP!

 http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Witch