>>He leaked this intel to the media in an attempt to boost his poll ratings.
Of course he did. Crap like that is in his political nature every bit as much as deception is in the political nature of Ken Mehlman and the rest of the rainbow termites eating the RINOcracy from the inside out.
But the fact still remains that whereas he had it in the power of his pen to simply kill the program - and gift Iran with nuclear weapons in the process -- he didn't do so.
Hes earned himself a Fatwa from the Islamofascists for his apostasy. So is he a Muslim? Evidently they dont think so. Taquia? Maybe; but there are plenty of reasons to dethrone the Weather King other than the he hates America meme.
The history of the political swamp Bracky was bred in goes all the way back to days when a rabbit attacked Jimmy Carter.
It is indeed a wicked web they have woven and that can not be undone by admiring the tailor's new dialectic clothers - but rather by comparing what the tailors have manifested against the original specification for the Republic: "TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, [American] governments are instituted among men".
>>you end up defending Obama.
No.
The right to search for truth implies also a duty; one must not conceal any part of what one has recognized to be true.
Albert Einstein
Dont you agree with Albert? Isnt the Truth worth defending?
Once upon a time we had a Justice system that depended upon that. Id like to see that system, and the Republic that constitutes its framework, make a comeback. Wouldnt you?
He didn't do so because he saw it as a publicity stunt to boost his poll numbers. That's why he leaked the intel. As he has said, he'll have more leeway after the election.