Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll

If it is so clear to all the Freeper Law scholars, why doesn’t the SCOTUS act to remove Obama?


171 posted on 09/03/2012 5:14:33 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: originalbuckeye

Fear.


173 posted on 09/03/2012 6:02:02 AM PDT by Godebert (No Person Except a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: originalbuckeye

“If it is so clear to all the Freeper Law scholars, why doesn’t the SCOTUS act to remove Obama?”

Because they cannot, per the U.S.Constitution.

Only Congress can remove a sitting President. In the case of a President who is ineligible, a usurper, Congress has delegated its authority to try the offender via Quo warranto in the District Court of Washington, D.C.

So, all these efforts to drag BHO2 into SCOTUS is the wrong way to go about it. The problem with the District Court in Washington is that it is so thoroughly in the back pocket of the Democratic Party that route is effectively blocked. The only way to remove BHO2 from the White House is to vote someone else into that office.

The Rule of Law no longer really applies in the U.S. today. Corruption throughout our judiciial system is endemic. When Newt Gringrich said that most judges should be fired, he wasn’t joking.


175 posted on 09/03/2012 1:08:28 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson