Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Delhi Rebels

Both. I think he believes (correctly) that if he answers the question then there will be those who say he can’t be objective in participating in the case and that ultimately he will have no choice but to disqualify himself.


166 posted on 09/02/2012 10:48:07 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant
Both. I think he believes (correctly) that if he answers the question then there will be those who say he can’t be objective in participating in the case and that ultimately he will have no choice but to disqualify himself.

But on what grounds? Because he he has his own idea of the definition of natural born citizen? That's not grounds for recusal.

He probably answered the question the way he did because he didn't want to be bothered by someone like Klayman.

167 posted on 09/02/2012 12:33:49 PM PDT by Delhi Rebels (There was a row in Silver Street - the regiments was out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson