Science only ‘knows’ what it ‘knows’ until a large enough collection of other contradictory information causes them the re-evaluate the ‘sure’ and ‘solid’ conclusions of prior generations en mass. There are no more flat earthers lurking about [to my knowledge] but that has not stopped the ‘re-arranging of deck chairs’ about the story versions, nor claimed authors and origins.
No. Science only Knows that which has been proven by logic. If future knowledge was constantly undermining previous VALIDATED Knowledge then we could know nothing. Are you saying that we can know nothing? If so you are invalidating man’s consciousness. Please explain how man’s consciousness is invalid.
You can can not do that without invalidating your own argument. Existence, Identity, Consciousness are the three most fundamental principles of all knowledge. You can not deny any one of them without accepting and using them. But try if you want to.
The reason that the flatness of the Earth was overturned is That it was never true to begin with. It could not be validated by logic.
Now refute my logic please.