Well stated.
The biggest problem for evolutionists is not creation science, it is simple basic mathematics. Mathematicians who study evolution overwhelming conclude that not billions [nor even trillions] of years are sufficient for these ridiculous claims to have a chance of ever happening.
Not too mention how they now omit the abiogenesis of life. DNA does not write itself - even a one-celled organism is more complex than any system of computer code. And the chances of a good mutation are far out-weighed by an accumulation of bad mutations that will kill any/all life forms before they can ever begin to macro-evolve. Current DNA research pegs this at 20,000 years tops before all life forms go extinct.
From creation.com - top ten natural clocks...
” Biological evidence for a young age of the earth
1. DNA in “ancient” fossils. DNA extracted from bacteria that are supposed to be 425 million years old brings into question that age, because DNA could not last more than thousands of years.
2. Lazarus bacteria—bacteria revived from salt inclusions supposedly 250 million years old, suggest the salt is not millions of years old. See also Salty saga.
3. The decay in the human genome due to multiple slightly deleterious mutations each generation is consistent with an origin several thousand years ago. Sanford, J., Genetic entropy and the mystery of the genome, Ivan Press, 2005; see review of the book and the interview with the author in Creation 30(4):45–47,September 2008. This has been confirmed by realistic modelling of population genetics, which shows that genomes are young, in the order of thousands of years. See Sanford, J., Baumgardner, J., Brewer, W., Gibson, P. and Remine, W., Mendel’s Accountant: A biologically realistic forward-time population genetics program, SCPE 8(2):147–165, 2007.
4. The data for “mitochondrial Eve” are consistent with a common origin of all humans several thousand years ago.
5. Very limited variation in the DNA sequence on the human Y-chromosome around the world is consistent with a recent origin of mankind, thousands not millions of years.
6. Many fossil bones “dated” at many millions of years old are hardly mineralized, if at all. This contradicts the widely believed old age of the earth. See, for example, Dinosaur bones just how old are they really?
7. Dinosaur blood cells, blood vessels, proteins (hemoglobin, osteocalcin, collagen) are not consistent with their supposed age, but make more sense if the remains are young.
8. Lack of 50:50 racemization of amino acids in fossils “dated” at millions of years old, whereas complete racemization would occur in thousands of years.
9. Living fossils—jellyfish, graptolites, coelacanth, stromatolites, Wollemi pine and hundreds more. That many hundreds of species could remain so unchanged, for even up to billions of years in the case of stromatolites, speaks against the millions and billions of years being real.
10. Discontinuous fossil sequences. E.g. Coelacanth, Wollemi pine and various “index” fossils, which are present in supposedly ancient strata, missing in strata representing many millions of years since, but still living today. Such discontinuities speak against the interpretation of the rock formations as vast geological ages—how could Coelacanths have avoided being fossilized for 65 million years, for example? See The “Lazarus effect”: rodent “resurrection”!”
Yea you and I both know that but it has nothing to do with the fact that the evolutionist will just resort to the old “every scientist agrees that evolution is a fact and anyone who disagrees is an idiot.”
It’s like having an argument with a 5 year old that has a bit of a more developed vocabulary. I quit arguing with people about this years ago. It is a religion for most of these people. To abandon that belief would force them to deal with very serious eternal consequences of their present lives.