Yes - furthermore legally all is open to vague interpretation which makes the whole thing murky and hard to pin down.
As in this part of the statement, which is clearly in the minds of the lgbts and was never said or implied:
“They have made it clear the lives of LGBT individuals are unacceptable to them and that same-gender families are unwelcome at Chick-fil-A.”
This would appear to be the gay communities’ interpretation of the “Chick-Fil-A corporate culture” - in reality, it is that they cannot bear tolerance merely, and want absolute approval, which is driving this thing. Can that be part of jurisprudence? No longer tolerance , but approval, or cries of “discrimination” and litigation will follow?
Where I live in Maryland where there have been discrimination laws protecting sexual orientation for years and I am rare here because I always saw the danger in expanding such a classification to a vague term called 'orientation'.
Last year they expanded it to trans-sexuals.