[longtermmemmory]

Since it is legal to not hire tobacco smokers it should be doubly important to be able to exclude pot smokers. In fact it would be a marketing bonus. It may also be a liability insurnce REQUIREMENT to exclude pot smokers.

There is no DWI/DUI pot test for the roadside. Generally, the pot smoker simply drives impaired and kills pedestrians and other drivers. The most efficient solution is to pull the license of medicinal pot users.

[Boogieman]

“There is no DWI/DUI pot test for the roadside.”

There’s a general impairment test isn’t there? Touch your nose, walk the dotted line, etc?

If that test isn’t catching the potheads, then either the test needs to be updated, or those potheads that are passing it are not that impaired.

[jimt]

Generally, the pot smoker simply drives impaired and kills pedestrians and other drivers.

And how many pot smokers are busted for DUI compared to how many drunks ? And what are the statistics on fatalities ?

I think you'll find the drunks are far and away the major threat. Like 1000 times.