[hoosiermama]

Are you familiar with the source of this article?

[Meet the New Boss]

Clearly there needs to be further digging as to the proper sources of the coding instructions in 1961.

And this thread is NOT to debate the coding for father’s race, since there is a whole ‘nother thread on that topic.

The purpose of this thread is to invite comment on the apparent evidence, based on this source document, that Obama’s COLB was originally coded as a “home birth.”

[philman_36]

Are you familiar with the source of this article?
It doesn't matter the source of the article.
As I noted...@#226 and as Meet the New Boss noted...issued by HEW revised August 14, 1961... it's 10 days after the fact.
This is just more distraction, IMO. I guess it was assumed that nobody would notice the revised date.

That manual is useless except as fodder for even more speculation.

[LucyT]

Thanks, Hoosiermama.

.

[LucyT]

Oops.

Second try.

.