Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

Oh, forgot to mention in my other post- I go over this exact sort of thing when my department does it’s bi-annual Active Shooter training.

Is there any reason you can think of why you wouldn’t be responsible if you shoot and kill a bystander by accident? That’s the very definition of “Manslaughter,” NDCC 12.1-06-02, or, if you get a particularly liberal prosecutor, “Negligent Homicide,” NDCC 12.1-06-03.

And one more time, just for the record- Dark. Tear gas. He has a gas mask and a rifle. You have a pistol. He’s looking to kill anything moving. You’re looking to kill him specifically. Good luck hitting him.


49 posted on 07/22/2012 8:11:39 PM PDT by RipTorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: RipTorn
"Is there any reason you can think of why you wouldn’t be responsible if you shoot and kill a bystander by accident? That’s the very definition of “Manslaughter,” NDCC 12.1-06-02, or, if you get a particularly liberal prosecutor, “Negligent Homicide,” NDCC 12.1-06-03.

Yeah, the stray was an accident that happened when taking down scum that was actively killing innocent people. Imperfect action does not equate to negligence.

"And one more time, just for the record- Dark. Tear gas. He has a gas mask and a rifle. You have a pistol. He’s looking to kill anything moving. You’re looking to kill him specifically. Good luck hitting him."

No I don't have a pistol, but I will at least be holding an eyeball and some brains in 2 of my fingers when I finally expire.

53 posted on 07/22/2012 9:48:56 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson