Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kenny Bunk
1) I'm not the skeptic, the INS Immigration Inspector was the skeptic.

2) A court must have jurisdiction at the place the alleged crime occurred. Where did the crime occur? I suppose DC. Or perhaps Hawaii. Or maybe Denver. The fact is, at this time, no one to my knowledge is sure where the forgery occurred.

A DA has jurisdiction in a particular political entity, not everywhere in the country. Furthermore, assuming it could be shown that the crime occurred in say, DC, the DC prosecutor would have to file the case. Any chance of that?

The reason I posted what I did is to start with A and get the right people to take the next step.

Realistically, if the US Congress and the US Supreme Court won't touch this, we're screwed. The rule of law has completely broken down.

It's pitchforks and torches after this.

434 posted on 07/24/2012 4:31:00 PM PDT by oneolcop (Lead, Follow or Get the Hell Out of the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]


To: oneolcop
Your reasoning is excellent. And you are skeptical enough for any man.

Sheriff Joe has built the case, amassed the evidence ... and literally, as you observed ... has nowhere to take it. To me though, this whole thing with Sheriff Joe comes down to one man: AZ Secretary of State Bennett.

It is his responsibility to vet candidates appearing on AZ's ballot. What Sheriff Joe has done is to build an excellent case of doubt as to Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.'s true name and identity, and shown that he has referred challengers to his website. On that website is posted a contrived document, made by the WH, which is not completely in congruence with any data received from Hawaii.

This is enough justification for any State Attorney General or Secretary of State to remove anyone from the ballot ... and in fact it is regularly done ... whereupon the challenged candidate must either accept the decision or present bona fides which convince the SoS or AG.

Let's face it, a document which is offered as a "Certified Copy of a Birth Certificate on File in Hawaii," but isn't, a highly dubious Selective Service Registration, and a Social Security number that actually belongs to someone else are not the elements upon which one might seek to build widespread trust.

Bennett needs no legal permission. He is well within his powers under the AZ Constitution. He has more than enough information to go on and fulfill the responsibilities of his office.

461 posted on 07/24/2012 5:56:41 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (What Hawaii gave to Obama was not what Obama gave to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson