Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitutions framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obamas family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama IIs birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled Burack and Biraq) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Sure looks like it.
Thanks to the work of Arpaio and his investigators, there is a sound and solid platform on which to stand.
And I want some of the anti-”birthers” or supporters of SAD and FMD as parents to think about my question above, which I will repeat simply.
Since Zullo has now proved conclusively, that anyone born anywhere can easily obtain a “legitimate fake but real” birth certificate from the HI DoH, why did they need to create this elaborate forgery?
You’ll have to cram up on Indonesian political history, although Sukarno died in 1970, he was under house-arrest for several years...how-ever, he still wielded a great deal of influence from what I recall reading.
Thanks. Yes, that Committee for the Protection of Foreign Born connection must have come in handy. Of course FMD was a major player in the early life of the person in the WH.
*
Have you noticed there’s been no mention of FMD and Stanley Armour’s acquaintance until the boy supposedly returned from Indonesia in what we are told was in 1970/71?
Why would they have only met then? They might well have been acquainted years before then...so imagine, FMD knows the Dunhams, (and thanks to someone whose name I won’t mention, we also know now that FMD did live in Honolulu...while working at The Record) FMD knows the Dunhams well enough to know their daughter is studying and working part time as an au pair in Chicago, FMD also has jouralist certification which allows him access to the union-run printing works on the island, how easy for FMD who knows the loopholes, to place an advertisiment in the local papers...he could maybe do that in the print-shop by removing someone else’s name? Who the heck would know?
Are there any printers on board here who could tell us if that was possible?
And silly Stanley Armour and Madelyn go along with it, after all, they are progressives, and it’s all in a good cause. The Road to Hell is paved with Good Intentions.
And the key to it all is of course, the kenyan and HIS friendship with Neil Abercrombie, who attended the U of HI at the same time...there’s never been any indication that HE knew Frank Marshall Davis either, although he’s shown giving a lecture to a couple of hundred union members in a park in Hawaii...
Hush my mouth. They’ll call me a subversive, sarc.
With today’s print technology it would not be hard at all to tamper with newspaper copy.
However, in 1961, printers were still using hot type and linotype machines. They would have had to bribe a linotype operator to insert the material — not something a novice could do. I suppose that would be a possibility, but it seems unlikely.
Considering what we know of Hawaii’s lax record-keeping, it would have been much easier just to record the birth with the proper authorities, tell them whatever manufactured tale you wanted them to know, and make it part of the official record.
PING ***MMAJOR ALERT***
The article at the top of the thread has been amended again to reveal a claim that the “Bomford BC” was actually a corrupted version of the true Kenyan BC for Barry that is in the BNA! The intent was to lure and then mock “birthers”
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/07/obamas-kenyan-birth-records-discovered.html
begin quote
Recall, on August 1, 2009, Dr. Alan Keyes, Pamela Barnett and 42 other plaintiffs filed evidence in a lawsuit challenging Obama eligibility which included a copy of an image of an alleged Kenyan Copy of Certification of Registration of Birth (CCRB). In the hours after the image appeared on the internet, MSNBC and other liberal mainstream, pro-Obama networks went ballistic attempting to debunk the idea that such a document exists.
The liberal media went out of its way to discredit the image, protesting too much, going as far as to claim that the Kenyan CCRB image was forged based on an Australian birth certificate which was miraculously discovered by an unnamed blogger for a man named Bomford.
On August 2, Keith Olbermann led the deranged effort on his now defunct “Countdown” show to lie and propagandize the CCRB using insults and baseless criticism of unknown “birthers” who he claimed “attempted and failed to pass off a forgery.”
Strangely, however, no one in the mainstream liberal media would address the question now answered by the recent discovery at the BNA. The Bomford document and the Kenyan CCRB would indeed appear the same under British birth registration processes and documentation formats because both municipalities in Kenya and Australia, in 1961, operated under the Registrar General of the British government.
It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that “birthers” had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama’s forgers to create “shell game” confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama’s forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.
Essentially, the Bomford affair was just another coverup to hide Obama’s foreign birth records.
end quote
There’s an area of research that needs attention, the activities of the organisation Frank Marshall Davis belonged to; The Protection of the Foreign Born. We need to know the activities they engaged in, we understand their objectives, but how did they achieve them?
Did they provide false indentification, did they fabricate documents for marriages, births and deaths for example?
Somebody , somewhere has; GOT to show documentation to support these claims.
Otherwise there is nothing to balance/refute the obots.
This is the photo that shows how Barry has SAD’s chin and ears. I’ve always thought he looks like his mother, but the first baby picture in the grouping at #286 looks just like the older Frank M. Davis. I wish someone would put them side by side.
yeah...and end up like the fellow who accessed the passport records? I wouldn’t and don’t expect anyone else to.
FOR THE RECORD:
Kenyan document ignites firestorm over authenticity (Let’s Discuss Bomford HERE)
WND ^ | 8/4/09 | Staff
Posted on Wednesday, 5 August 2009 12:33:27 PM by pissant
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308435/posts?page=1
I'm speechless at your power of observation, it's funny how I never noticed...did you want some sarcasm with that?
A cross-reference placed in the Bomford thread pointing back to this thread would be more appropriate, IMO.
No, I had never seen that particular baby photo. It hit me that it he looks more like FMD in that baby picture than in any of his other childhood pictures. It has been my experience that baby boys often show the most resemblance to their fathers when they are newborn. Our youngest son looked so much like his father at birth, I laughed out loud when I first laid eyes on him. I don’t go by books (as someone said), I go by people and my granny’s intuition.
Baby David is not the son of FM Davis unless FM Davis managed to impregnate Ruth making BHO Sr the more likely father of these two similar babies, IMO.
You really aught to know by now that what you prefer doesn’t matter one iota to me. I’m not your lacky to whom you issue instructions.
FOR THE RECORD:
Heads Up - Multiple COLBS Warning [someone swapped out the Kenya BC AFTER it was posted]
Various ^ | August 3, 2009 | Various
Posted on 08/03/2009 2:12:53 PM PDT by Calpernia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2307402/posts?q=1&;page=1#1
TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND ONE COMMENTS.
No, what that would suggest is that the father of zero had an affair with Ruth before the kenyan went to Harvard. Didn’t I ask you nicely yesterday to do your own thing and not address me? Surely you can find a way to make your point without following on my tail like an evil smell?
Who that boy top right is, is open to everyone making up their own mind. If he was so unlike zero someone (other than yourself) would have commented on it by now. It’s my compilation, I suggest you make one of your own.
There is one baby photo there of sixteen images, we have been led to believe the baby image is of zero, but there’s no way to be certain. There are fifteen other photographs in that composite, and you choose just the one to focus on?
To add the cherry to the cake, post a photo of FMD’s son.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.