Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Forget the biggest culprit...the PROPAGANDA MEDIA.
The only thing missing is the domestic fear of black/OWS/MEDIA engineered riots.
That does continue to matter to me, and probably a number of others. You cannot dictate the direction of interest or research, each one will follow their own methods and where the results lead them. Meanwhile, I see no reason why we cannot be of assistance to each other. I posted that link to the Dr Ang'awa article because you mentioned 'the doctor', but you didn't include what happened to him. His ultimate fate in 1970 is important, as is where he was living.
Forget the biggest culprit...the PROPAGANDA MEDIA.
NEVER, THEY WILL SUFFER LIKE US, NO DOUBT IN MY MIND!
A free country DOES NOT EXIST without free press!
The only thing missing is the domestic fear of black/OWS/MEDIA engineered riots.
You're right. I wrote about domestic violence in so many posts, I'm sure you read or two in the last couple of years. On my longest post, I didn't want to repeat it, and so...
A note below item #1 in my post got knocked out in editing. It said: (although the above scenario may very well happen to reelect 0b0z0 WITHOUT an election, with or without allied help!)
Thank you for the tip, SB.
To all who answered my post, thank you very much for your comments.
bitt,
It wasn't a rant. You don't want to see me ranting!!! LOL!
I Forgot Forget the biggest culprit...
The Dr's murder, although tragic is not relevant to our legal predicament and possible constitution crisis. Do you understand how important this is to us? It's not about their Kardashian style love interests, even though Rush calls him President Kardashian. Our country is at stake. Our way of life.
Yes I pointed out your informative information and pointed out another link that is also informative and relevant to getting BO and the communists out of office. If you want to continue your interest far be it from me to dictate them to you, just PLEASE do not spam threads where others are trying to discuss the target.....removing BO from office and saving OUR country.
You're being insensitive to our peril. Please understand. You are an excellent researcher. We need people with your skills to search. Yes we are still searching, some through Frmail as open thread have proven to be too open to the enemy. We now have professionals, Corsi, Sheriff Joe, Breitbart who can use legal methods to obtain information. Sometimes we send them tips. Before the lawyers often came to us, just to have the free manpower to search the web.
Remember our goal and don't become defensive if we continue to remind people what that goal is all about. We already know he's a liar and a fraud, that doesn't need to be proven. Truth needs to be proven. Our nation, our country MUST be preserved...Is it too much to ask of you to take you "interesting" topics to other threads?....
I agree with everything. And this part especially.
His real identity not only does matter, it matters very much. His entire fraud and facade and life of crime and stolen ID, and who enabled and helped and committed crimes to get him where he is - all of it needs to be exposed. All of it. NOTHING is unimportant. NOTHING should be off the table or swept under the rug.
It’s ALL important and relevant.
His stolen Id IS relevant. who is mama is is not. As a matter of legal record it is SADO. THe rest is gossip/hearsay objectable in a court of law.
THe expose’ of who is involved will only come out in a court of law. Anything not presentable there is just junk.
We have the good on NP because she took the eligibility pargraph out of the sworn statement. That is relevant. It is presentable. Whether his mama took nooooodies is not. She may be a lowest tramp that ever lived, doesn’t matter, If however she dropped his citizenship or provided him with an illegal SS number that IS relevant. Just stay on target...Keep asking yourself how the judge would rule if the information your seeking was presented before him.
Do you understand what I’m trying to point out?
When the SHTF, innocent, sleepy Americans will be hurt like most of us.
There is one difference; we know what’s happening and some of us got ready for it, however, others won’t know what hit them.
Then comes the media shellacking of the hurt “domestic terrorists” that are us, and rooting for the feral bastards by calling them victims!
Of course, our AG will be arresting us as fast and furious as he can for defending ourselves, families and property.
Leaving the media to report unmolested ain’t gonna cut it!
No, I don’t see what you’re saying. I’m saying that in a court of law, any crimes committed in order to get an ineligible person president would be important and relevant. If his ID is fake (which it is), then the next question is “who is he really”? His fake ID mom and pop are fake - not read - as his ID is fake - not real.
So any legal outcome would obviously be looking at trying to find out who he really is, since his “legal” docs are forgeries. It’s really simple.
Quite the little dictator aren’t you? Now it’s you who decides who can post comments and what is allowed to be posted. If you don’t like what I write, skip it. If only YOUR POV is acceptable on FR, I suggest you ask the owner to notify me.
Beautiful post. Could not agree more.
Thank you very much, Yaelle. I appreciate it.
Legally his mother is SADO his father is SR. Case closed. The rest would not be allowed as evidence in a court of law. I know the law. Have experiece with this specific issue. My Xs husband’s daughter is not biologically his...Doesn’t matter he was the parent of record. That’s the way the law is written.
Yes, they could have used an Alinsky rule...FOrce them to use the laws in place to achieve your goal. But we are still a nation of laws. If you don’t understand that...you’re in soap opera land. It just doesn’t happen the way except in the mysteries stories. If you don’t understand that I have nothing further to add. THink about it...Want to follow the law or not? There is no law against saying you are or aren’t someone’s parent/child. Had a friend in high school who only found out her dad was not when she applied for a marriage license....That ol legal thing again. He was her daddy, but not her father of record.
Ok, I’ve read this everal times. WHY did the Prince go to the scotus? I’m a little foggy on what that is all about.
I Certianly will...Jim I’ve asked all to stay on target and not go off on tangents. Did not mention Fred by name, but he and Little Jeremiah have become defensive.
Have pointed out that 0 mama’s noodies and who she was or wasn’t screwing is irrlevant in a court of law. She and Sr are the parents of record.
Since AB has discover the publisher’s pamphlet where BO claims he was “born in Kenya” and since they have now discover his birth records in the British Archive,(something freepers suspected years ago) we need to stay on task.
Our country, way of life and constitution are in peril. Frivilous gossip interupts the thread. No where have I suggested that either are the culprits, but I guess they’re trying the shoe on and it fits. In fact I pinged numerous people to the post. WE must stay on task and get the SOB out of office.
Fred suggested we let you decide.
You have conclusive, provenanced proof of that, have you?
Tell you what, I'm so disgusted, I'll gladly stay off any thread I see your name on. And should it turn out that I am banned because I have the gall to disagree with you, I'll take it as a compliment.
Don’t know either...the wedding was on the 29th. He appears on Monday on FOX news running up the steps of the SCOTUS. Shep reported he came for the day. The next day it was reported that he decided to stay. Asked on the other thread if anyone had a way of finding out what was before the court at that time. Why did the queen’s husband make a trip so soon after the wedding to the SCOTUS? Since it was posted that they found BO’s birth records in the British Archives was it relevent? Was there a BC case before the court at that time?
Maybe he met one of the justices at a party and was invited on a tour.
What would that mean?
Do you have a reference re: US not allowing dual citizenship?
I don't believe a minor (who holds US citizenship by birth) can be deprived of his citizenship by the actions of another country, and I don't believe that having citizenship granted by, say, Indonesia can, or ever could, deprive a US citizen minor of his US citizenship.
Whether or not the person who calls himself "Barack Obama" in fact held US citizenship at or from birth is a separate question, of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.