Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Yeah ...
And she’s got incoming flak .. from a budget-busting,
earmark pig spendaholic pubbie
Lingle blasts GOP Rep. after he backs her Dem opponent
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57479906-503544/lingle-blasts-gop-rep-after-he-backs-her-dem-opponent/
!!! TERM LIMITS !!!
OUT WITH THE VESTED BELTWAY EMPERORS .. ALL OF ‘EM!!
I'm seeing a lot of deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara) growing behind them to their left and center, and a Canary Island Date Palm (Phoenix canariensis) to their right.
Deodar cedar is planted aplenty in California, but this tree is the national tree of Pakistan, its native land.
“So she lied in that interview?”
Flat-out, IMO.
I didn’t know the names...just am familiar with the look of trees and plants in N.California and HI, and that photo of them on horses is not in HI for sure.
Well, she sounds better than the alternative.
HI is so corrupt they wouldn’t elect a real conservative.
But that seems to be the same fat kid sitting on the horse as is shown with the Golden Gate Bridge in the background, and little Maya is about the same age, so it looks like the man with the moustache was with them on a tip to the mainland.
She would not have been lying if she saw the name of a child named BHO2 on a birth index for the period 1960-1964. She would not have been able to inspect anything more, she would not have been able to tell you the maiden name of the mother or the date of birth from the index.
Ah, that explains some things. Maybe why Abercrombie originally said “It’s there, I’ll find it” and subsequently had to swallow his words.
Fred, that picture sort of bugs me.
It doesn’t appear processed/Photoshopped. That’s not it.
A trip to the mainland? California? I don’t think so.
For one thing, BO is barefoot. I couldn’t think of any (even 1970s-era) California livery stable that would have let some 10-12-year-old kid ride without footwear of some sort (preferably with heels).
For another, the horses they’re riding don’t look like any standard-issue rental horses I’ve seen at any rental stable in California. Reasons?
(a) The horses are too small. They appear to be no higher than 15 hands. For a kid that’s a good size, but for an adult they might get them a bigger horse.
(b) The tack is Eastern/English style, with ring snaffle bits and metal stirrups. A California livery stable would have Western tack: cheek bar snaffle bits, big leather saddles with horns, and leather/wood stirrups.
Doesn’t look right to me.
And so he slammed shut the lid to the Pandora's Box he had opened and kept his mouth shut. The name of the mother is the key. They added unham to Ann D.
A thought about the horse photo. Looks like Northern CA scenery to me, at least the part around SF/north, not redwood country of course.
Maybe they were visiting someone who owned horses; a private individual who happened to have smallish horses and didn’t mind if the kid was barefoot. And might have had the English horse gear. A lot of kids went barefoot in HI around that time, even to school sometimes; probably the same in Indo.
|
That sounds pretty clear. And maybe he had a “visit” or “email” from someone higher up.
Very interesting. I assume that “everyone” in HI likes all that Food Stamp money.
Revolting.
By golly! I think you’re right...those poor horses, I kept thinking, the one she’s sitting on looks about ready to give up the ghost. And as you say, who in their right mind would allow a child to ride barefoot, or allow an adult to hold someone like little Maya in their lap?
Maybe still in Indonesia.
You indicated they were prohibited from looking into those records, and her statement apparently contradicts that.
Zactly ! She said nothing about the legal verifiability or any substantive info reflecting what actually appears on the precious document.
Lingle’s statement contradicted her own and Fukino’s previous statements.
There was a big FR thread on this statement, IIRC, and it was clear that she would have been violating HI statutes if she, as governor, looked at the BC without Barry's permission via an actual legal release, which he has never given.
Corsi says he had a mole in the HI DOH who told him there was no original 1961 BC in the file (Trump says his guys found no record of the mom in Kapiolani) and that the forged BC was placed in the DOH file shortly before April 2011.
The first link won’t load for me, and 77 minutes might just be a little long to wait...the Washington Post article needs to be verified, I seem to recall that statement she supposedly made about a Press Release was debunked, there never was a Press Release discovered anywhere...iirc, and who was her ‘health director’ and why is it relative that this health director was a physician by background...?...is that a helpful qualification for checking a birth index?
I’m skeptical. But that’s nothing new.
Thanks for the reminder of what goes for helpful explanations from Hawaii.
I still want to see that Press Release...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.