Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: moonshot925

That was an opinion of a man.....nearly one million died to debate it. He is not right because his side won......I repeat, there is absolutely zero in the US Constitution that prohibits secession. There wasnt in 1861, and there still isnt.


32 posted on 07/15/2012 4:14:34 PM PDT by fahraint (git theah fuhstest with the mostest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: fahraint
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it

/johnny

47 posted on 07/15/2012 4:24:24 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: fahraint
That was an opinion of a man

Roger Taney was Chief Justice of the United States for 28 years. His word has some authority.

I also gave you a Supreme Court case, Texas v. White, which came to the conclusion that the Texas ordinance of secession was absolutely null.

52 posted on 07/15/2012 4:26:10 PM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: fahraint
there is absolutely zero in the US Constitution that prohibits secession

Correct. And that would seem to argue for the legality of secession. On the other hand, the Constitution does not mention any possible mechanism for secession. That would indicate that secession is illegal.

This is yet another case where the Founders were just plain sloppy. So it just comes down to might makes right.

103 posted on 07/15/2012 5:32:08 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson