Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
Yeah, a RINO. Only a RINO would say this -

"This whole idea of personal autonomy, well I don’t think most conservatives hold that point of view. Some do. They have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do, government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulations low, that we shouldn’t get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn’t get involved in cultural issues. You know, people should do whatever they want. Well, that is not how traditional conservatives view the world and I think most conservatives understand that individuals can’t go it alone."

Santorum's comments concerning George Zimmerman raise all sorts of red RINO flags.

His support of Arlen Specter - more red RINO flags.

This is written about the RINO -

"In his book he comments, seemingly with a shrug, “Some will reject what I have to say as a kind of ‘Big Government’ conservatism.”

They sure will. A list of the government interventions that Santorum endorses includes national service, promotion of prison ministries, “individual development accounts,” publicly financed trust funds for children, community-investment incentives, strengthened obscenity enforcement, covenant marriage, assorted tax breaks, economic literacy programs in “every school in America” (his italics), and more. Lots more."

LINK

More on the great "conservative" Santorum -

The evidence does show that Santorum was opposed to ethanol before 9/11. Twice, in 1997 and 1998, Santorum voted to end ethanol subsidies. And the evidence also shows that, at times, he was supportive of an ethanol mandate after 9/11. But in 2005, Santorum voted to end the ethanol mandate. If the original flip-flop was a principled stand taken by Santorum because of national security concerns, we’re at a loss to explain this flip-flop-flip-again vote.

In the same “50 Things” campaign brochure, Santorum boasts about sponsoring a bill to regulate “price gouging and unfair pricing by the big oil companies.” This contradicts his opposition to a “windfall profits tax” that Democrats tried to impose on oil companies in 2005. He also voted YES on Sarbanes-Oxley, which was an overreaching bill that tried to tighten accounting regulations following the Enron scandal.

LINK

So don't give me that crap about good ole saint Rick. It's all hogwash. Abortion is the only reason you sided with Santorum....a one trick pony, a single issue voter who is going to try their best to get Obama re-elected.
249 posted on 07/18/2012 5:22:29 PM PDT by MissouriConservative (Voting Anyone but Obama in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: MissouriConservative

Ahh, I expected you to quote what Santorum said in that one speech.

Yeah, you support abortion, gay marriage, etc. Of course you won’t support Santorum, because Santorum rejects your premise that we can do whatever we want and still exist as a free nation.


251 posted on 07/19/2012 2:23:53 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson