[Macoozie]

Your take on the court's (Robert's) view of that section of tax law is 180 degrees out of phase.
If UN-CONSTITUTIONAL penalties disguised, referred to or otherwise enabled as "taxes" are in the tax code, then the referred to tax code should be invalidated as unconstitutional. This should have been an opportunity to invalidate that section of the "tax" code used in the POTUS argument referring to penalties Joined with the invalidation of the commerce clause argument this would have driven a stake into the heart of this un-_odly assault on all Americans.
Upholding Obamacare by referencing an unconstitutional provision is an impeachable offense. Roberts has failed to be constrained by his oath of office.
The SCOTUS is sworn to uphold the US CONSTITUTION, not the existing tax code.

[Bigun]

Upholding Obamacare by referencing an unconstitutional provision is an impeachable offense. Roberts has failed to be constrained by his oath of office. The SCOTUS is sworn to uphold the US CONSTITUTION, not the existing tax code.

Hear here!! Well said!

Bravo!