“The nine countries known to have nuclear bombs currently possess about 23,000 of the things.”
300. That would be on submarines deployed around the world, domestic silos, etc.
Of course, Barack has already said he's taken the concept of a US nuclear response to ANY attacks off the table (at least with him as Commander in Chief).
Dereliction of duty.
I could live with 300 nuclear weapons if we have a president with the “stones” to use them when/if needed. Super accurate, advanced decoy devices to assist with reentry and defeat any anti-missile systems, combined with a willingness to use them at the slightest attack on any American interest, I could accept this low number.
But since we know there is NO Democrat with he “stones” to use force against anybody except what most of us refer to as patriotic American citizens, then I reckon we need to defeat this worthless oxygen thief and keep our level of nuclear weapons at at higher number; say about 5,000 and use them or other weapons as needed to protect America.
“Of course, Barack has already said he’s taken the concept of a US nuclear response to ANY attacks off the table (at least with him as Commander in Chief).”
Could you please provide a citation for that? I’d be interested to see it.