Because you and other Foggers don't understand it and have to have English explained to you all the time.
The ruling says the 14th uses wording that excludes from citizenship the exact same people who were already excluded under the NBC clause “by the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America”.
It doesn't say ANTHING about the NBC clause, so stop trying to pass of a lie. It's talking about a separate and generic principle of "citizenship by birth." The only time the court talks about the NBC clause is to explain how it is not defined by the 14th amendment and that it is defined by birth in the country to citizen parents.
But then, they had already said that “by the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America”, NBC included the children of aliens domiciled here in amity with the government.
Yes, the "English colonies" would have utilized the law of England ... the United States, not so much ... AND this doesn't say ANYTHING at all about the NBC clause. You're playing a dishonest game of connect the dots.
Birthers complain that all the judges are corrupt, but there is an alternate explanation - that birthers are simply wrong about the Founder’s intent.
I haven't said anything about judges being corrupt. They have been wrong, and I prove that point constantly, just like I school you every time you post one of your lies.
“It’s talking about a separate and generic principle of “citizenship by birth.”
It is talking about “the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America” - discussed in length in the first half of the decision.
“The only time the court talks about the NBC clause is to explain how it is not defined by the 14th amendment and that it is defined by birth in the country to citizen parents.”
You can go on claiming that, and you can go on losing every case brought to court. Not because the world is a giant conspiracy, but because you are factually wrong. They spent half the decision discussing the meaning of NBC: “the law of England and by our own law from the time of the first settlement of the English colonies in America”, or as they say elsewhere:
“It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.
III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established.”
Repeating for emphasis: “...and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established.”