[FroggyTheGremlim]

"It is the plaintiff's burden, however, to allege and prove that a candidate is not eligible. "

Seems to me it's the candidate's burden to prove he is eligible.

But that was America before the Communist Revolution.

[Digger]

Seems to me it's the candidate's burden to prove he is eligible. But that was America before the Communist Revolution.

As RUSH would say, right on, right on, right on.

[bgill]

Seems to me it's the candidate's burden to prove he is eligible.

That would be when he applies to get on the ballot. The burden of proof flips to the other side for this suit. But, yeah, I agree he's never proven to anyone he's eligible. Did we expect anything different than this to be thrown out just like every other case against golden boy?