If we actively euthanize such a person, that's murder, I agree with you 100 percent.
If we deny food and water, I also agree, 100 percent.
But if we withhold a medical treatment costing $200,000 that has only a marginal chance of prolonging life?
That's a very different story, unless the patient is paying his own way.
I'm not a Nazi because I happen to oppose unlimited use of my money to pay for someone else's healthcare.
What I have never been able to understand is why a medical procedure should ever cost $200,000 in the first place.
Until there were insurance companies, medicine and doctors and surgeries and treatments were affordable. What the heck happened? What the heck? Even research and
“development” should not be so catastrophically expensive.
I just don’t get it.
They can do whatever they want to you. You don’t get to use your ‘logic’ to decide who lives and who is murdered. If you have not gotten it already, your government has no logic.
The GOVERNMENT’s denial of care to targeted groups is murder of those people. There is no way to save yourself with better insurance or supplemental insurance when the government is dictating what doctors can and can not do in medical treatment. So you don’t get to decide based on your own ‘logic’ and are targeted for death via the denial of care. The denial of care decision is a death sentence to you whether they give you a slow death of the untreated disease killing you or a quick death with a death shot. It’s euthanisa either way.
Once they have targeted you for death through the denial of care, it will be considered merciful to give you the death shot rather than making you suffer a slow death from untreated disease.