Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
So why is the opinion of Lee’s cousin as to the ‘correct side’ of greater significance to the opinion of Lee himself?

Because you said, "You are assuming that the Union = the United States, which, in 1861, was not the case."

You were contending that an agreement existed about federal versus state citizenship -- that one was a citizen of a state, rather than a citizen of the country.

There was no such agreed upon understanding that one was a citizen of a state, rather than a citizen of the country.

It may have been convenient for people to convince themselves of that, but it wasn't the case, particularly for people who had taken an oath to the federal constitution and laws.

149 posted on 06/25/2012 2:47:26 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: x

“You were contending that an agreement existed about federal versus state citizenship — that one was a citizen of a state, rather than a citizen of the country.”

That’s not what I was contending. He was a traitor, if, and only if, one believes that the Union was the same as the United States. If they are not - then he no more took up arms against his own country than he defended it.


162 posted on 06/25/2012 3:34:54 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson