Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter
The quote you cited looks more like a standard piece of legalese.

Yeah I'm not seeing the difference. Annoyance and embarrassment still mean basically the same thing. Producing a birth certificate shouldn't be an undue burden either. After all, Obama voted for a law in 2005 that puts such a burden on everyone who wants to apply for a drivers license or ID card. Submitting a birth certificate as positive evidence in such a situation is an obligation and should have been done voluntarily. It speaks volumes that Obama's lawyers would try to fight off something they should have wanted to do on their own.

33 posted on 06/21/2012 10:24:36 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

They should have cut to the chase and cited the divine right kings. Better yet, they should have argued that the only possible reason to question BHO’s BC is racism. They had so many good options. Maybe if they’d known in advance the judges would buy anything and everything they argued, they would have filed that crayon BC Abercrombie waves around in the shopped pic that turns up periodically. The judges would have accepted it w a straight face, no questions asked.


34 posted on 06/21/2012 10:41:03 AM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson