[presently no screen name]

It was a sad commentary on Sarah after years of Mitt trashing her HERE IN THE LOWER 48! And those liberals in Alaska never did that before to her and she was in politics for years - and had 83% approval rating before she was selected for VP. And America loved her conservative values and her accomplishments - how refreshing. PRO Constitution, a conservative by her record and not by her lips but a record to prove it!

And then came POS LIBERAL Romney with his plan for '12..with no accomplishments FOR America but against what she stands for...and the Palin trashing started on day one. EVIL/liberal attacks GOOD/conservative.

You don't have to be a rocket science, just have a desire for TRUTH - it had MITT'S fingerprints ALL over those BOGUS charges in Alaska and she was acquitted of ALL. So I call it as you presented it.

[Boogieman]

“it had MITT’S fingerprints”

The man just about hired every anti-Palinite on McCain’s staff as soon as the 2008 election was over. He’s as calculating a politician as they come; he knew the biggest threat to his plan, and he set to work on her before her plane touched down back in Alaska.

[HiTech RedNeck]

If you can show a causal line from Mitt to the leftist Democrat attacks through the ethics loophole on Sarah Palin in Alaska, well give it your darndest. I have seen no documentation, only innuendo. If you think Mitt is a person of innuendo, certainly you then ought to know better than to indulge in that yourself.

Sarah was of sufficiently good character that Mitt mud would just drop off without leaving a mark. Mitt is not who Sarah feared. It was Democrats who hit a new low. They didn’t just hit below the belt, they struck at the soles of her feet.