Gov. Palin has more experience in her cuticle of her pinky.
Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Since you responded politely, I will answer a couple of your points.
Obama has not only most of the media, he has the dead vote, the dog vote, the duplicate voter-roll vote, the dirty-trick Chicago-style vote and every other kind of fraud imaginable, and he’s not afraid to use them. So unless he fully implodes before November, I’m not certain I’d count on less voter turnout as a padding, particularly with the black vote firmly in his pocket and the 65% of Latino’s consistently polling for Obama.
Certainly I believe there are horrified (or at least disgruntled) Obama voters who won’t vote again for him, but to what actual number, we won’t know until after Nov. 6.
If enough conservatives do as you suggest and not vote, I think that might add up to some damage for the Romney effort. At what point does Romney need that base vote to win?? And are you willing to be part of the effort that ends up in his defeat?
God forgive me if I need forgiving on this, but I just can’t stand by and waste my opportunity to help get rid of BHO. And yes, I’m sick and tired of holding my nose and voting for moderate republicans.
I do understand your viewpoints and I appreciate your post. I also share many of your concerns. Could even a republican majority in both Chambers stop a steam-rolling, hell-bent 2nd term Obama, though? I’m not so sure.
More so, if they endorsed him, put their stamp of approval on him/which means his liberal ways. And they rallied around the GOPE - then they owned by them. So it's more of the same with a definite LIBERAL ending, not republican and definitely not conservative ending.
I said I would vote for him over Romney. Romney is a despicable RINO. Yes, I would vote for Clinton over Romney.
Better a known enemy inside the gate . . .
Well, we’ve now seen all spectrums of your idiocy.
Anyone not in full agreement with you and in full devotion to Palin is all manner of really bad things.
You have now resumed being amusing.
Well done.
Yes..... it’s a Palin thing...
That was NOT my suggestion. Indeed, I believe informed Americans have a DUTY to vote, that not to vote is a dereliction of duty.
Obama has not only most of the media, he has the dead vote, the dog vote, the duplicate voter-roll vote, the dirty-trick Chicago-style vote and every other kind of fraud imaginable, and he’s not afraid to use them.
His media "support," if he won on a 34-40% plurality, would be even more laughable than it is now, and even now it's only fooling a few -- the MSM is loathed in America; read the comments on MSM websites when a pro-Obama story appears. That Obama might win by vote fraud (as he did the last time, I believe), is zero reason to vote for an amoral statist Romney. We'd still end up with the same results: a liberal minority that has seized power over the conservative majority. If Obama, as loathed as he is now, could still win a majority via vote fraud, then we are lost ANYWAY.
Could even a republican majority in both Chambers stop a steam-rolling, hell-bent 2nd term Obama, though? I’m not so sure.
I'm not either, but there's a good chance, I believe, that they could because Obama is not Oz the Great and Powerful, and if started his second term on a humiliating plurality with the world knowing that nearly two out of three voted against him, he would be psychologically gut-punched. On the other hand, the chance of conservatives in Congress being able to stop Romney's liberal agenda advances are virtually nil. Romney's win, especially if it was a landslide, would make them a minority compared to moderate Republicans joined by liberal Democrats who share the same agenda as Romney.
God has blessed us with a scenario where Obama is so loathed that splitting the vote could well work to create a 34-40% plurality for either victor, Romney or Obama. WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE by voting Third Party. On the other hand, if Romney wins in a landslide, we'd lose it all.
The pay is good. I made $500.00 today.
Idiocy is saying the obvious? How unteachable of you.
We seen all spectrums of your PDS for more than three years!
Anyone not in full agreement with you and in full devotion to Palin is all manner of really bad things.
That thinking is from your PDS. I never said anything about full agreement but responded to 'your joke' but there you go, again, saying/implying what isn't there but only what's in your own mind.
You have now resumed being amusing.
You do have your ups and downs. Bi-polar?
Seeing as Obama has a penchant for bypassing congress, I wouldn't count on it.
Well, now we know where you stand on rape.
where do YOU stand on Mr. ROmneyCARE’s misogyny?
and on Mr. RomneyCARE’s attacks on Gov. Palin through
surrogates?
It's a thread about Palin. Pay attention.
But above all, we’d better be pure and we’d better not vote for Romney, after all he’s the same, so lets give Bambi four more years and see if he can be even worse, maybe even worse than Hugo Chavez......
Exactly!
We can deal with Romney, we die under Obama.
Equating Romney with Obama is irrational and sick.
Puhleze. Bishop Romney is worse.
YOU KNOW WHO OBAMA IS AND DO NOT TRUST HIM.
Bishop RomneyCARE delivers the same, but you
believe his long term lies.
_______________________________
I am convinced that there are more than a few genuine freepers for obama...this is one of their tactics.
Naive wishful thinking with zero evidence to support it.
...we die under Obama.
Pure hysteria.
NO TO ROMNEY. NO TO OBAMA. NO TO RINOs.
And I am convinced that there are more than a few genuine FReepers for Romney. You are one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.